{"id":897,"date":"2010-08-04T10:50:43","date_gmt":"2010-08-04T18:50:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=897"},"modified":"2010-08-04T10:54:24","modified_gmt":"2010-08-04T18:54:24","slug":"us-open-round-1-triage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=897","title":{"rendered":"US Open, Round 1: Triage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s still too early to say much about how the tournament is going &#8212; one one round finished out of nine! But Cailen, Thadeus and I were all disappointed in different ways by our first games.<\/p>\n<p>I was paired against a class B player named Ken Ivens. Once again &#8212; for the fifth time this year! &#8212; I found myself on the White side of Cailen&#8217;s variation of the Slav (1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. cd cd 5. Qb3 &#8211;which I actually did a ChessLecture on). As usual, I got a very comfortable advantage, but I was not able to push it through to a victory. I thought Ivens played a good, patient game, but nevertheless I missed one really good winning chance.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/ivens1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/ivens1.jpg\" width=\"307\" height=\"307\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>White to move.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>How many times have I said it &#8212; if only there were someone to tap you on your shoulder during the game and say, &#8220;White to move and win&#8221;? Here it&#8217;s not quite that clear, but I very clearly overlooked the best move. I had about twelve minutes left for fourteen moves, so I was in a bit of time pressure, and I just played the &#8220;automatic&#8221; move here, <font color=\"#ff0000\">27. Ba2<\/font>. He played <font color=\"#ff0000\">27. &#8230; Kd7 28. b4 Nc6<\/font>. I think that White still has winning chances here, but I committed another inaccuracy or two in the time scramble and was left with a blocked position where I was unable to make progress.<\/p>\n<p>The move White has to play here is <strong>27. Nc7!<\/strong>\u00c2\u00a0 I thought about this move during the game, and I clearly remember thinking, &#8220;Oh, that can&#8217;t be any good,&#8221; and I <em>did not analyze it any further<\/em>. I think that my reaction was based on two facts: I&#8217;m walking into a pin (after 27. &#8230; Rc8) and I&#8217;m also leaving a piece on prise (27. &#8230; Nxb3 or 27. &#8230; Nxc7 28. Rxc7+ Kd8). With three serious objections to the move, I think I figured it was not worth the time to figure them all out.<\/p>\n<p>But every one of these lines has a problem for Black! If 27. &#8230; Nxb3 28. Nxa8 Nxd4 29. Rd2 and White&#8217;s knight escapes via b6. If 27. &#8230; Nxc7 28. Rxc7+ Kd8 29. Rxf7! Nxb3 30. Rf8+. And finally, if <strong>27. &#8230; Rc8 28. Nxd5+! cd 29. Rxc8 Nxb3 30. Rb8! Nxd4 31. Rxb7+ Ke6 <\/strong>(diagram)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/ivens2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/ivens2.jpg\" width=\"307\" height=\"307\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This is the trickiest line to evaluate. Black has two knights for a rook and a pawn, but White&#8217;s passed pawns will be dangerous. Here the computer finds a key twist that I almost certainly would <em>not<\/em> have found in time pressure:<\/p>\n<p><strong>32. a4! &#8230;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This makes the position a complete win for White. The point is that Black can&#8217;t take on e5 because his wretched knight on e8 is lost after Re7+. The second point is that this gains a tempo over the more obvious line, 32. Rxb6+ Kxe5 33. a4 Nd6!, when Black&#8217;s knights are able to organize a defense in time. By playing 32. a4 first, White does not allow the &#8230; Nd6 defense.<\/p>\n<p>There are a couple of good morals here. First, you can&#8217;t ever play a good move if you let your initial reaction &#8220;Oh, that can&#8217;t be good&#8221; stop you from looking at it. Sometime, it&#8217;s true, when you&#8217;re in time trouble you have to do some triage and avoid complex lines that you can&#8217;t get to the bottom of. Which brings up the second point: don&#8217;t get into time trouble! I really had no excuse for it in this game. With a 40\/2 (40 moves in 2 hours) time control, I spent 1 hour on just 5 moves, from move 14 to move 18, and that is just ridiculous.<\/p>\n<p>Cailen and Thadeus were both paired up. Thadeus (who is an A player) was paired against Max Cornejo, a 2400-plus player. He got a pretty decent position but made a seemingly innocent transposition of moves, and Cornejo punished it beautifully. I&#8217;ll have to show that game in my next post. I think that it shows one of Thadeus&#8217;s weaknesses. He has great strategic understanding for a class A player, but he barely looks at tactics. He is always thinking, &#8220;I&#8217;m going to do this and this and this,&#8221; and it scarcely enters his mind to check for tactical tricks that might disrupt his deeply planned machinations. He even disdains them.<\/p>\n<p>Cailen is the exact opposite &#8212; he never met a tactic he didn&#8217;t like. Unfortunately, in his game he got out-tacticked by his opponent and lost a pawn, and then later he hung a piece and resigned. Not a great game for him, but he was paired against someone 300 rating points higher. I told him, &#8220;It&#8217;s all right, because you were going to lose a game in this tournament <em>sometime.<\/em>&#8220;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s still too early to say much about how the tournament is going &#8212; one one round finished out of nine! But Cailen, Thadeus and I were all disappointed in different ways by our first games. I was paired against a class B player named Ken Ivens. Once again &#8212; for the fifth time this [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1363,10,11,16,12],"tags":[1472,1474,173,1080],"class_list":["post-897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-current-news","category-endings","category-games","category-positions","category-tournaments","tag-cailen-melville","tag-max-cornejo","tag-tactics","tag-thadeus-frei"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=897"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/897\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}