{"id":4683,"date":"2017-04-26T10:39:01","date_gmt":"2017-04-26T18:39:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=4683"},"modified":"2017-04-26T10:39:01","modified_gmt":"2017-04-26T18:39:01","slug":"cross-pin-sighting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=4683","title":{"rendered":"Cross Pin Sighting!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Six years ago I wrote a post called <a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1118\" target=\"_blank\">Master Class<\/a>, about a class taught by Varuzhan Akobian at the Berkeley Chess School, which I went to along with several of my chess friends. In the comment thread after my post there was a lively debate over whether the class was really worth the time and money. Suffice to say that several of us were at least a little bit disappointed.<\/p>\n<p>But.<\/p>\n<p>No time when you are truly engaged with chess is ever truly wasted! In Akobian&#8217;s class we spent probably an hour or two on some endgame studies, which he said were an important part of the Soviet chess school. I&#8217;ve never been a great fan of studies, because they are carefully composed and employ themes that seem too unlikely to arise in a real game. But Akobian showed one study, composer unknown, that made a lasting impression on me.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4685\" alt=\"crosspin study 1\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-1.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-1.jpg 532w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-1-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-1-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><em>White to play and win.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: 1q6\/2b2p1p\/7k\/8\/1p1Q4\/8\/1K3B2\/8 w &#8211; &#8211; 0 1<\/p>\n<p>The solution begins in obvious enough fashion with <strong>1. Qf6+ Kh5 2. Qf5+ Kh6<\/strong>. Obviously White could settle for a draw here with 3. Qf6+, and in a tournament situation many of us would probably do so (after all, we&#8217;re three pawns down!). But White continues to play checks, which seem almost aimless at first. <strong>3. Be3+ Kg7 4. Qg5+ Kf8<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>One thing that makes this such a great teaching example is the fact that Black only has one option at each move. 4. &#8230; Kh8?? would get mated after 5. Bd4+.<\/p>\n<p>Now after<strong> 5. Bc5+ Bd6<\/strong> we get the distinctive position of the study.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4686\" alt=\"crosspin study 2\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-2.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-2.jpg 532w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-2-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-2-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><em>Position after 5. &#8230; Bd6. White to play and win.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: 1q3k2\/5p1p\/3b4\/2B3Q1\/1p6\/8\/1K6\/8 w &#8211; &#8211; 0 6<\/p>\n<p>Here White plays the amazing move <strong>6. Qe5!!<\/strong> This sets up the motif known as a cross-pin. It is a rare situation where the same piece is pinned in two different ways, and the pins create a cross on the chess board: the bishop on d6 is simultaneously pinned on the c5-f8 diagonal and on the e5-b8 diagonal.<\/p>\n<p>One thing that makes\u00a0cross-pins so amazing is that\u00a0if you only had one pin, you probably wouldn&#8217;t even call it a pin. Take away the bishop on c5 and king on f8, and Black could just play 6. &#8230; Bxe5. Take away the queens on e5 and b8, and Black could just play 6. &#8230; Bxc5. But somehow the combination of two non-pins turns into an ultra-pin. In a ChessLecture that I gave on this topic, I compared a cross-pin to epoxy glue, in which you mix two chemicals, neither of which is effective alone, but together they form an unbreakable bond.<\/p>\n<p>By the way, the study doesn&#8217;t end here! White is winning a piece, but with Q+B against Q+3P, is he really winning the game? Let&#8217;s see! Black has to play<strong> 6. &#8230; Kg8<\/strong>, stepping out of one of the pins. White plays <strong>7. Bxd6<\/strong>, and Black&#8217;s move is again forced:<strong> 7. &#8230; Qd8<\/strong>, to stop Qg5+. White plays<strong> 8. Qg3+ Kh8 9. Be5+ f6<\/strong>, and once again it looks as if White is stymied.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-3.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4687\" alt=\"crosspin study 3\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-3.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-3.jpg 532w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-3-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-study-3-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><em>Position after 9. &#8230; f6. White to play and win.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: 3q3k\/7p\/5p2\/4B3\/1p6\/6Q1\/1K6\/8 w &#8211; &#8211; 0 10<\/p>\n<p>How does White make progress? The answer, once again, is a cross-pin! White plays <strong>10. Qg5!!<\/strong> (Note, by the way, that 10. Qh4? would not do because Black plays 10. &#8230; Qd2+. That&#8217;s a beautiful little grace note added by the composer.) Incredible! Once again, neither pin would be effective alone, as Black&#8217;s f6 pawn could just take on e5 or g5, but together they are deadly. Black can do nothing to stop 11. Bxf6+ with either mate or the winning of a queen, so the study ends here.<\/p>\n<p>Well, this is an amazing composition; after solving this problem you will never forget the idea of cross-pins. But can\u00a0they ever happen in a real game?<\/p>\n<p>Well, I have played hundreds of tournament games and thousands of games just for fun, and I can&#8217;t remember a single time when my opponent or I played a cross-pin. But who knows what opportunities might have been missed? After all, I never even heard of cross-pins until 2011.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday, though, there was a beautiful example of a cross-pin at the highest level of tournament chess. 2017 Reykjavik Open. Round 8. The top-seeded player, super-GM Anish Giri, playing Black against GM Alexander Donchenko. Giri was half a point behind the leaders, so he badly needed a win to catch up.<\/p>\n<p>Giri became the butt of a lot of jokes\u00a0last year when he played 14 consecutive draws in the Candidates Tournament in Moscow. But in this game he sure showed that he knew how to play for a win! The Dutch whiz kid played an ambitious two-pawn sacrifice that was probably not quite sound, but he succeeded in tying his German opponent up in knots. They got to this position a couple moves after the time control.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-giri.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4684\" alt=\"crosspin giri\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-giri.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-giri.jpg 532w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-giri-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/crosspin-giri-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><em>Position after 43. Nxe4. Black to move.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: brr4k\/b5qp\/8\/3B4\/P3NP2\/4p1P1\/QP5P\/2B2R1K b &#8211; &#8211; 0 43<\/p>\n<p>I got this position in an e-mail from my friend and former teammate Larry Smith, who included a clue that Black played a move here that forced an immediate resignation.<\/p>\n<p>If I were playing Black, I would almost certainly play 43. &#8230; e2. I think that Black is winning after 44. Re1 Qd5! when White can&#8217;t take the e-pawn because of mate on g1. But still, after 45. Bxa8, the game is not even close to over. Certainly this is not a variation that would cause White to resign immediately.<\/p>\n<p>It took me a minute, but I started trying to think of ways in which White&#8217;s bishop could be deflected from the long diagonal, and that&#8217;s when the solution hit me:<\/p>\n<p><strong>43. &#8230; Qf7!! 44. White resigns<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Of course, if 44. Bxa8 Qxa2 wins the queen, and if 44. Bxf7 Bxe5+ 45. Kg1 e2+ 46. Rf2 e1R mate. Or e1Q mate. Or Rxc1 mate. Also, defending the bishop won&#8217;t help: 44. Nc3 Rxc3! or 44. Rd1 e2!<\/p>\n<p>So this is why you pay attention in master class. Because some day, you&#8217;re going to be on board one in the Reykjavik Open and you&#8217;re going to need to know what a cross-pin is. Alas, I don&#8217;t think that I would have found this over the board; I only found it because of Larry&#8217;s clue that White resigned immediately. Kudos to Anish Giri, who I think saw the idea at least two or three moves earlier and baited his opponent into the trap.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Six years ago I wrote a post called Master Class, about a class taught by Varuzhan Akobian at the Berkeley Chess School, which I went to along with several of my chess friends. In the comment thread after my post there was a lively debate over whether the class was really worth the time and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,1363,10,11,25,16],"tags":[3720,3349,3441,103,3721,3722,1205],"class_list":["post-4683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chess-lecture","category-current-news","category-endings","category-games","category-people","category-positions","tag-alexander-donchenko","tag-anish-giri","tag-larry-smith","tag-queen-sacrifice","tag-reykjavik-open","tag-studies","tag-varuzhan-akobian"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4683"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4683\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4688,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4683\/revisions\/4688"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}