{"id":3708,"date":"2015-07-23T13:58:45","date_gmt":"2015-07-23T21:58:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3708"},"modified":"2015-07-23T14:09:08","modified_gmt":"2015-07-23T22:09:08","slug":"matrix-chess-iv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3708","title":{"rendered":"Matrix Chess IV"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For those who haven&#8217;t been following, &#8220;Matrix chess&#8221; is my name for a training technique where I play a blitz\u00a0(10-minute) game against the computer but I am allowed to take a time out at one point in the game for as long as I want. It gets its name from the Matrix movies, where Neo has the ability to slow down time in his battles against the computer enemies. The previous posts I wrote on Matrix chess were:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3664\" target=\"_blank\">Trump Cards (in Chess!)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3618\" target=\"_blank\">Matrix Chess&#8230; Reloaded<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3592\" target=\"_blank\">A Fascinating Experiment<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Two weeks ago I sat down for a game against Shredder with its rating set at 2504. I&#8217;ve never beaten it at that high a rating before and expected to get thrashed, but this was one game where I was not very impressed with its play. I was White, the opening was a Nimzovich Defense (1. d4 Nc6) and we got to the following position after 23 moves:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-3709\" alt=\"matrix 4-1\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-1.jpg\" width=\"508\" height=\"508\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-1.jpg 564w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-1-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-1-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 508px) 100vw, 508px\" \/><\/a><em>Position after 22. &#8230; Bd8. White to move.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN:1r1brk2\/1p3pp1\/p2p1nq1\/2pPpN2\/4P1P1\/4BPKR\/1PP3Q1\/5R2 w &#8211; &#8211; 0 30<\/p>\n<p>What do you think about this position? Does White have an advantage? What should I play?<\/p>\n<p>Of course the first thing to notice is that the computer just moved its bishop (from h4) to d8, attacking my a-pawn. So one of the important questions is whether White has to defend the pawn or not. Against a human opponent I would not feel any qualms about sacrificing it. But against a computer, I wasn&#8217;t so sure. I thought that this could be a position where it just takes the pawn and grinds me down with its computer-like patience and accuracy. So I decided that now was the time to take my time-out.<\/p>\n<p>Well, the time-out lasted two weeks! I got busy with other things and forgot about the game, until this morning I found the slip of paper on my desk with the position written down. &#8220;What position is this?&#8221; I wondered. Then I looked at it carefully and remembered.<\/p>\n<p>With infinite time, I decided that the first question to ask was not whether I should defend the pawn or not. It&#8217;s too soon to decide that.\u00a0Instead, I asked one of the questions for strategic thinking that I&#8217;ve mentioned several times: &#8220;What are my (and the opponent&#8217;s) best and worst pieces?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s clear what my worst piece is: the knight on c3, which isn&#8217;t contributing in any meaningful way to my attack. The next question is: &#8220;Where would you like to put the knight, if you had all the time you want?&#8221; That answer is pretty easy, too. There&#8217;s a great hole on f5 where it would threaten the pawn on d6, threaten a royal fork on e7, and generally make life uncomfortable for Black&#8217;s king because it takes away an important flight square. Yes, f5 would be a fantastic square for the knight. Can we get there? Yes! Quite easily, with Ne2-g3-f5.<\/p>\n<p>Another relevant question is, &#8220;What side of the board should I play on?&#8221; Again, the answer seems clear. I have all of my pieces (except the knight) on the kingside and I have very dangerous attacking threats connected with the open h-file. Craig Mar is fond of saying that even if you are even or down in material, you can win if you have more material <em>in the critical\u00a0sector<\/em> of the board. In this case, White definitely has a preponderance of material on the kingside and so I <em>should<\/em> be able to make something happen. All of this is a very strong argument against playing defensively with 24. Ra1.<\/p>\n<p>Okay, so I&#8217;m leaning toward playing 24. Ne2, but there is another question I need to ask. It&#8217;s a little bit of an impatient move, saying that White wants some action <em>now<\/em>. One of the principles of Mike Splane chess is to take your time if you have the advantage. If you&#8217;re contemplating a tactical sequence, such as a sacrifice, ask yourself, &#8220;Is this a unique opportunity, where if I don&#8217;t seize the opportunity now I won&#8217;t get another chance?&#8221; After all, maybe if I\u00a0play 24. Ra1 I can follow up with Ne2-g3-f5, but without risking a pawn.<\/p>\n<p>When I looked carefully, I realized that this was in fact a unique opportunity. If White plays 24. Ra1? Black can play 24. &#8230; Bg5!, either trading off his worst piece (remember the first question?) or else greatly improving its prospects. In fact, Black should have played 23. &#8230; Bg5 on the previous move, instead of being tempted to win material with 23. &#8230; Bd8. Shredder has played too much like a human, and this is my chance to take advantage.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, is the sacrifice sound? Notice that this question, which was once my first question, has now become the last question.\u00a0The more I looked\u00a0at the position after 24. Ne2! Bxa5? 25. Ng3!, the more I loved it. Black just has huge problems to contend with. If, for instance, 25. &#8230; Rfd8 26. Nf5 Rd7, White can even think about playing 27. Nh4 Qf6 28. g5. Black&#8217;s pieces are all discombobulated. It looked as if Black&#8217;s most solid defense would be to bring the bishop back to d8, but then notice that Black has wasted three tempi (&#8230; Bd8, &#8230; Bxa4, and &#8230; Bd8) just to win a pawn on a5 that is, for the time being, nearly irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, Black is probably better off not taking the pawn and playing 24. &#8230; Bg5, as he (it?) should have done last move. But in that case, I have\u00a0won a useful tempo (Nc3-Ne2) for free. So I played <strong>24. Ne2<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The next few moves went more or less as expected: <strong>24. &#8230; Bxa5?<\/strong> (just like a human, Shredder continues with its mistaken conception) <strong>25. Ng3 Rfe8 26. Nf5 Bd8<\/strong> (yup, expected that) <strong>27. Kg3.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Now Shredder played the nearly incomprehensible <strong>27. &#8230; Rb8<\/strong>. This really surprised me, wasting another tempo with a do-nothing move on the queenside when the kingside is burning. In Shredder&#8217;s defense, the move I had expected, 27. &#8230; Bg5, isn&#8217;t any good either. I had planned to play 28. Rxh7, but in fact the straightforward 28. Bxg5 is even better. Whichever way Black takes, White is going to triple up on the h-file. Black will have to play &#8230; f6 to create a flight square for the king, and then White can snatch the d6 pawn with advantage.<\/p>\n<p>I continued <strong>28. Rh5<\/strong>, preparing to triple on the h-file and also hoping to entice Black to move his (its?) knight to f6. That is, in fact, what it did: <strong>28. &#8230; Nf6 29. Rh3 Kf8<\/strong> and now I missed my chance to end the game.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-3710\" alt=\"matrix 4-2\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-2.jpg\" width=\"508\" height=\"508\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-2.jpg 564w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-2-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/matrix-4-2-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 508px) 100vw, 508px\" \/><\/a><em>Position after 29. &#8230; Kf8. White to move.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: 1r1brk2\/1p3pp1\/p2p1nq1\/2pPpN2\/4P1P1\/4BPKR\/1PP3Q1\/5R2 w &#8211; &#8211; 0 30<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the first move I thought of was 30. Rh8+, but then after the forced 30. &#8230; Ng8 I thought that maybe I was overrating my attack and missing a golden opportunity to take a free, and very important, pawn on d6. So without much time for analysis, I went ahead and played <strong>30. Nxd6?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If I had played 30. Rh8+ Ng8 31. R1h1, Black would absolutely be in a world of hurt. White has two crushing threats, either 32. R1h7 with the idea of Rxg7 or 32. Qh3 with the idea of Rxg8+ forcing mate. Black basically has to resign or give up lots of material. After 30. Nxd6? Black was able to play on with <strong>30. &#8230; Nh5+! 31. Rxh5 Qxd6<\/strong>. Even though White still stands much better. Black has managed to trade off my best attacker, the knight on f5. Isn&#8217;t it funny how that piece, formerly my worst piece, turned into my best?<\/p>\n<p>I eventually did win the game, but it was ugly. In fact, I botched it to such an extent that at one point Shredder could have forced a draw by repetition. The first time we got to the crucial position, it played the (only)\u00a0correct move and I had to\u00a0go back to\u00a0the previous position. But then the second time, it decided, &#8220;Nah, I don&#8217;t want a draw&#8221; and played a losing move instead! That struck me as very human-like. In fact, Shredder lost this game by playing too much like a human. Go figure that one out, Oracle!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For those who haven&#8217;t been following, &#8220;Matrix chess&#8221; is my name for a training technique where I play a blitz\u00a0(10-minute) game against the computer but I am allowed to take a time out at one point in the game for as long as I want. It gets its name from the Matrix movies, where Neo [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[11,16],"tags":[3277,1869,2845,3279,1638,3276,152,3241,1376,1245,1049,2920,2885,3278],"class_list":["post-3708","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-games","category-positions","tag-best-piece","tag-computer-chess","tag-craig-mar","tag-critical-sector","tag-mike-splane","tag-neo","tag-open-file","tag-oracle","tag-pawn-sacrifice","tag-shredder","tag-training","tag-unique-opportunities","tag-wasted-tempi","tag-worst-piece"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3708","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3708"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3708\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3714,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3708\/revisions\/3714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3708"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3708"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3708"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}