{"id":3639,"date":"2015-05-26T08:44:58","date_gmt":"2015-05-26T16:44:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3639"},"modified":"2015-05-26T08:44:58","modified_gmt":"2015-05-26T16:44:58","slug":"the-internet-never-forgets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3639","title":{"rendered":"The Internet Never Forgets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I got a terrific comment on a very old post, one that also happens to be a favorite of mine: <a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=803\" target=\"_blank\">Jerry Hanken on Reshevsky vs. Fischer <\/a>(2010). That was a post about the aborted Reshevsky-Fischer match from 1961 and how it fell apart, and it ended with a wonderful anecdote that the late Jerry Hanken told me about the match. The new comment, from &#8220;MPropp,&#8221; added something that had been missing before &#8212; a viewpoint from somebody in Reshevsky&#8217;s camp. I use the word &#8220;camp&#8221; loosely; MPropp was a student of Reshevsky&#8217;s.<\/p>\n<p>This comment got me thinking: How can readers of this blog find out about good posts that I wrote a long time ago? I feel guilty about the fact that I have been promising a personal top-ten list since forever, and yet I have\u00a0never compiled it. Today I will finally make good on my promise. I will also give you an update on the most popular posts in this blog, which of course is not the same as the best posts! And finally, it&#8217;s your turn in the sun: I will give you a list of the top five COMMENTERS on this blog.<\/p>\n<p>First, my personal top-ten list. It&#8217;s actually a &#8220;fine fifteen,&#8221; and I&#8217;m not going to attempt to rate them. That&#8217;s because I want you to read them all! If I rated them, you would only read the top one or three or so. Instead, I will give them chronologically.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=35\" target=\"_blank\">John Donaldson &#8212; The Chief Mechanic <\/a>(2007). One of my very first blog posts, and one of my few posts to be written in journalistic style. I quickly decided that this was not the way I wanted to run my blog. Too much work!<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=395\" target=\"_blank\">Pruess Parties Like It&#8217;s 1899 <\/a>(2008). Quite possibly my favorite title ever, and it&#8217;s a fantastic game by Pruess. a Cochrane Gambit topped off by a spectacular queen sacrifice and double-check-mate. Oh. My. God.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=754\" target=\"_blank\">Tortoise and Hare <\/a>(2009). A meditation on playing slow versus playing fast, told in fable form. Neat combination at the end, based on several of my ChessLecture ideas.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=803\" target=\"_blank\">Jerry Hanken on Reshevsky vs. Fischer <\/a>(2010). Maybe my best &#8220;story&#8221; post ever. Jerry gets all the credit for that.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1030\" target=\"_blank\">The Art of Doing Nothing <\/a>(2011). Here I introduce the Russian word<em> nichevo-ne-dielanye<\/em>, which loosely translates as the title of this post. A classic Mike Splane game where he literally just moves his pieces back and forth while his opponent ruins his own position.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1154\" target=\"_blank\">How to Break Fort Knox in 13 Moves <\/a>(2011). Another Mike Splane game, and the total opposite of the previous one. He dials up a queen sacrifice (not accepted by his opponent) to win in Morphy-esque fashion.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1203\" target=\"_blank\">Fourth Endgame of the Apocalpyse <\/a>(2011). The K+R+B versus K+R endgame. It&#8217;s brutally hard for both players, and if you play chess long enough, it&#8217;s out there waiting to get you. I will modestly opine that this post is the best place on the Internet to start learning its intricacies.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1665\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;I Failed and No One Died&#8221;<\/a> (2012). The only off-topic post on this list, but I think it&#8217;s an important point to teach our children, and arguably it does have some relevance to chess, too.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1902\" target=\"_blank\">History in the Humblest of Places <\/a>(2012). Why every single kid matters, even the ones who finish last. Plus, a look at one of the most amazing ratings graphs ever.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1435\" target=\"_blank\">Gone but not forgotten <\/a>(2012). Tribute to Ted Yudacufski. One of the sad necessities in writing a blog is having to write about people who&#8217;ve passed away, but these posts also\u00a0remind us that we are all connected.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=2126\" target=\"_blank\">Rock, Paper, Scissors (part 2)<\/a> (2013). A really esoteric puzzle that was perhaps of interest only to me&#8230; until Sam Shankland discovered what has to be the best solution.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=2659\" target=\"_blank\">Simple Chess, plus Incurable Optimism <\/a>(2013). A super important post, the only one that I take with me to every tournament. It introduces the Mike Splane Question (&#8220;How am I going to win this game?&#8221;) plus a number of other useful questions to ask when you don&#8217;t know what to do.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=2866\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;How a Master Eats an Expert&#8221;<\/a> (2014). You might have noticed that a lot of my good posts in recent years come from games shown at Mike Splane&#8217;s chess parties. This was a very impressive game shown by Craig Mar, with the same opening as &#8220;The Art of Doing Nothing.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3260\" target=\"_blank\">Queen and Bishop versus Two Rooks<\/a> (2014). This is another Endgame of the Apocalypse, but one that most of us will probably never face. I thought it was interesting to study because, unlike the others, there is no\u00a0published theory on it. Usually it&#8217;s a win for the Q+B, but using the Nalimov tablebases I found a way that Black can play for a draw.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3344\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Nuke the GM!&#8221; Lecture Posted <\/a>(2014). In 2006, before I started this blog, I played a game with\u00a0the Bryntse Gambit, a queen sacrifice on move six, against IM David Pruess and won. I finally got another chance to play it eight years later &#8212; this time against a GM, Sergei Kudrin. This time the result was a draw and a &#8220;what-might-have-been&#8221; feeling. The two games were bookends for my career at ChessLecture.com: the Pruess game was my first ChessLecture (&#8220;Nuke the Sicilian!&#8221;) and the Kudrin game (&#8220;Nuke the GM!&#8221;)\u00a0was an appropriate finish.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Next, here are the ten most\u00a0viewed posts on my blog, according to WordPress.com stats. In some cases they are far from being my best-written posts. It&#8217;s enough to make one scratch one&#8217;s head.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1145\" target=\"_blank\">Stop Presses II &#8230; Elizabeth Vicary Gets Hitched! <\/a>\u00a0[2011] (3407 views)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1154\" target=\"_blank\">How to Break Fort Knox in 13 Moves <\/a>[2011] (1828 views)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=247\" target=\"_blank\">Dana&#8217;s Opening Philosophy <\/a>[2008] (1780 views)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=60\" target=\"_blank\">Russian chess names &#8212; a guide for the perplexed<\/a> [2007] (1553 views)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3463\" target=\"_blank\">Grading the Openings (Part One)<\/a> [2015] (1246 views)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=1837\" target=\"_blank\">State chess champions &#8230; all states, all years <\/a>[2012] (1186 views)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=849\" target=\"_blank\">Why Not Nuke the Caro?<\/a> [2010] (1141 views)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=283\" target=\"_blank\">Karpov-Fischer <\/a>[2008] (1094 views)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=959\" target=\"_blank\">Maris&#8217;d<\/a> [2010] (981 views)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=2489\" target=\"_blank\">What if there were no King&#8217;s Gambit?<\/a> [2013] (980 views)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>A few random comments&#8230; First of all, the popularity of #1 completely bewilders me. Guys, Elizabeth Spiegel has been married for four years now. It&#8217;s not news any more. Yet here are the year-by-year view totals for that post. 2011: 78 views. 2012: 414 views. 2013: 2045 views (!!!). 2014: 691 views. 2015: 179 views. It&#8217;s insane &#8212; why did two thousand people want to read about Elizabeth&#8217;s marriage in 2013, two years after it happened? This was my most-read post of 2012, 2013, and 2014. It looks as if it won&#8217;t be the most-read for 2015, thank goodness. However, the two thousand views in 2013 are a record that may never be broken on this blog.<\/p>\n<p>The #2 post (How to Break Fort Knox) is a really good one, and you&#8217;ll notice that it is the only one that is both on my favorites list and the most popular list. However, I am a bit puzzled by how people keep finding it and reading it. Is there so much interest in the Fort Knox Variation of the French Defense?<\/p>\n<p>The most-popular list gives a slight advantage to older posts, which have had time to build up their totals over several years, like #3 and #4. However, #5 bucks that trend &#8212; it is a post from this year! The reason for its popularity was a link from reddit.com. Alas, I don&#8217;t see much evidence that the people who visited from Reddit turned into regular readers of this blog. Links on Reddit are so ephemeral that\u00a0I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see #5 have a steep drop-off in views in future years, or even future months of this year&#8230; but for now, 1246 views in one year is the second-most ever.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s ironic that of all the posts about openings\u00a0I&#8217;ve written, #7 would be the most popular. After all, I wrote a long series on the Bird Variation of the Ruy Lopez. And I have a small amount of notoriety for the Bryntse Gambit, which I&#8217;ve posted about more than once. I&#8217;m a fan of the King&#8217;s\u00a0Gambit, too.\u00a0Yet a spur-of-the-moment post about a Bryntse-like variation of the Caro, which I have never even played in a tournament, is more popular than any of them! Go figure!<\/p>\n<p>Finally, note that\u00a0there is an exciting battle going on between #9 and #10 to see which one will get to a thousand views first. If you click on one of them, you might just be the thousandth reader! Woo hoo!<\/p>\n<p>Finally, as promised, here is a list of the top six (sort of) or five (really) commenters on this blog.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Matt Hayes: 22 comments<\/li>\n<li>Mike Splane: 20 comments<\/li>\n<li>Brian Wall: 18 comments<\/li>\n<li>Mike Splane: 15 comments<\/li>\n<li>Paul Bryan Porter: 14 comments<\/li>\n<li>Edward: 14 comments<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>I can only assume that the reason Mike appears on the list twice is that he must have posted from two separate computers or accounts. Really, he should be #1 on the list with 35 comments, but maybe he wanted to give other people a chance. He&#8217;s contributed many ideas to the blog, through his chess parties and through other conversations we&#8217;ve had. I know both Matt and Brian pretty well and always look forward to their contributions. I don&#8217;t know Paul or Edward as well, but I want to tip my hat to them and thank them for being such faithful readers and commenters! Unfortunately, the Word Press.com stats don&#8217;t go any farther, so if you want to get your name\u00a0on this list, you&#8217;d better get busy commenting!<\/p>\n<p>Well, I hope that this post gives all of you some good reasons to burrow back into the past of this blog. We&#8217;re up to 775 posts now, which means that even I have forgotten most of them&#8230; But the Internet never forgets!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I got a terrific comment on a very old post, one that also happens to be a favorite of mine: Jerry Hanken on Reshevsky vs. Fischer (2010). That was a post about the aborted Reshevsky-Fischer match from 1961 and how it fell apart, and it ended with a wonderful anecdote that the late Jerry [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,10,9,25,171],"tags":[995,3235,1291,48,608,3234,3232,2169,3233,1160,1768,1638,3231,1725,1259,2190,1005],"class_list":["post-3639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chess-lecture","category-endings","category-openings","category-people","category-ruminations","tag-bobby-fischer","tag-bookends","tag-brian-wall","tag-comments","tag-david-pruess","tag-doing-nothing","tag-edward","tag-elizabeth-spiegel","tag-fine-fifteen","tag-jerry-hanken","tag-matt-hayes","tag-mike-splane","tag-paul-bryan-porter","tag-popularity","tag-samuel-reshevsky","tag-ted-yudacufski","tag-top-ten"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3639"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3640,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3639\/revisions\/3640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}