{"id":3530,"date":"2015-04-08T09:43:22","date_gmt":"2015-04-08T17:43:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3530"},"modified":"2015-04-08T09:51:52","modified_gmt":"2015-04-08T17:51:52","slug":"larry-evans-memorial-highlights-and-lowlights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3530","title":{"rendered":"Larry Evans Memorial &#8212; Highlights and Lowlights"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For your viewing pleasure today, I give you four interesting positions from the 2015 Larry Evans Memorial. Two of them are from my games, and two are from other people.<\/p>\n<p>First, let&#8217;s look at the finish of the game that won the tournament. This was Andrew Karklins versus Alexander Ivanov in round four. Both players entered the round with 3-0 scores, and they were playing on board one. Here is the position when Ivanov played his winning combination.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/karklins-ivanov.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-3531 aligncenter\" alt=\"karklins ivanov\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/karklins-ivanov.jpg\" width=\"338\" height=\"338\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/karklins-ivanov.jpg 564w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/karklins-ivanov-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/karklins-ivanov-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 338px) 100vw, 338px\" \/><\/a><em>Black to move.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: 8\/4ppk1\/5b2\/2RR2pp\/4B2P\/2P2KP1\/1r2r3\/8 b &#8211; &#8211; 0 1<\/p>\n<p>Obviously Karklins is in trouble, but how does Ivanov finish him off?<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll give you a hint. The first move is pretty obvious. The second move, however, is the cool one.<\/p>\n<p>Are you ready? Ivanov started with<strong> 1. &#8230; g4+<\/strong>, when <strong>2. Kf4<\/strong> is forced. After that, however, further checks don&#8217;t lead anywhere. But Ivanov played the elegant little sidestep <strong>2. &#8230; Re1!<\/strong>, which lets the second rook get into the attack. After <strong>3. Rxh5 Rf2+ 4. Kxg4<\/strong>, Black wins a piece with <strong>4. &#8230; Rxe4+<\/strong>. Karklins played only one more move, <strong>5. Kh3 Rf3<\/strong>, and then resigned. Black is winning the g-pawn too, and the endgame is obviously beyond hopeless for White.<\/p>\n<p>Although there were two more rounds to go after this game, Ivanov was in clear first place and nobody caught up with him as he drew his last two games.<\/p>\n<p>Next, let&#8217;s see the finish of Uyanga\u00a0Byambaa versus Anjelina Belakovskaia, the <em>de facto<\/em> women&#8217;s championship of the Larry Evans Memorial. They both scored 3\u00bd points, but\u00a0Uyanga won their head-to-head battle.\u00a0(There was no actual prize for the top woman. It&#8217;s been eons since I&#8217;ve played in a tournament with a women&#8217;s prize.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/byambaa-belakovskaia.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" alt=\"byambaa belakovskaia\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/byambaa-belakovskaia.jpg\" width=\"338\" height=\"338\" \/><\/a> <em>Position after 19. &#8230; Bf6. White to move.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: r1bk3r\/pppp1Bpp\/5b2\/qN6\/5P2\/1Q6\/P5PP\/4RR1K w &#8211; &#8211; 0 20<\/p>\n<p>This was a game straight\u00a0out of the nineteenth century. Uyanga played the Evans Gambit, and her Women&#8217;s Grandmaster opponent surprisingly played just like all those\u00a0stooge-of-the-day players from the 1800s, gobbling up all the material and not developing any of her queenside pieces. The\u00a0punishment was drastic. Do you see Uyanga&#8217;s winning move?<\/p>\n<p>Again\u00a0it&#8217;s a quiet move. If you need a hint, try to think about how White can take control over the back rank.<\/p>\n<p>Got it? Uyanga played <strong>20. Bg8!<\/strong>, and after this Black has no defense to the queen coming to f7. Maybe the best try is 20. &#8230; d6, but then 21. Qf7 Be5 22. fe Qxb5 23. ed cd 24. Qf8+ winning massive amounts of material. Or if 20. &#8230; d5 21. Qxd5+\u00a0Bd7 White wins in the same way as in the game.<\/p>\n<p>Belakovskaia played<strong> 20. &#8230; Qxb5<\/strong> instead, hoping to tempt Uyanga into taking the queen. Black would then have two bishops and two pawns for the queen &#8212; White is still almost surely winning, but at least Black might have a glimmer of hope. But Uyanga wasn&#8217;t having any of it. She sacrificed a rook with <strong>21. Re8+!!<\/strong> and Belakovskaia resigned, because 21. &#8230; Kxe8 22. Qf7+ Kd8 23. Qf8 is mate.<\/p>\n<p>Next! This is a position from my round four game with Chinguun Bayaraa. I&#8217;m playing the Black pieces.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/bayaraa-mackenzie.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-3533 aligncenter\" alt=\"bayaraa mackenzie\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/bayaraa-mackenzie.jpg\" width=\"338\" height=\"338\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/bayaraa-mackenzie.jpg 564w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/bayaraa-mackenzie-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/bayaraa-mackenzie-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 338px) 100vw, 338px\" \/><\/a><em>Position after 15. Nf3. Black to move.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: r2q1rk1\/1p3ppp\/p2b1n2\/5b2\/2Pp4\/5N2\/PP2BPPP\/R1BQ1RK1 b &#8211; &#8211; 0 15<\/p>\n<p>I was expecting a long battle in this game. The opening went pretty well for me; I have a nice cramping pawn on d4 and I&#8217;m temporarily a tempo ahead. On the other hand, White doesn&#8217;t have any weaknesses, and it&#8217;s unclear whether my\u00a0isolated\u00a0pawn on d4 will be an asset or a liability in the long run.<\/p>\n<p>However, I suddenly realized as I was looking at the position that White&#8217;s last move (15. Ne5-f3??) was an outright blunder. Do you see what the nine-year-old prodigy overlooked?<\/p>\n<p>The answer is a really standard type of trap:<strong> 15. &#8230; d3!<\/strong> White is forced to lose a piece. He played <strong>16. Bxd3 Bxd3<\/strong>, and now if he plays 17. Qxd3 he loses his queen after 17. &#8230; Bxh2+. Instead he soldiered on with <strong>18. Re1 Bxc4<\/strong>, but he is a full piece down and he resigned sixteen moves later.<\/p>\n<p>I was kind of surprised by this turn of events,\u00a0because this trick of &#8230; Bxh2+ unveiling a discovered attack on the queen is something that usually appears only\u00a0in the notes. Both players see it, and so it doesn&#8217;t actually get played on the board. But in this case, the trick was hidden just well enough to catch my opponent off guard.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve shown you the highlights of the tournament&#8230; but I also promised you a lowlight. We can call this one the Final-Round Follies. I&#8217;ve noticed that the last round of a long tournament is often when the craziest things occur, at least if you&#8217;re an amateur. (The grandmasters never even bother playing the last round, they just agree to a draw.)\u00a0You&#8217;re tired, your opponent&#8217;s tired, and you miss stuff.<\/p>\n<p>So I&#8217;m playing Abhishek Handigol, an expert, in the last round, and we get to this position. Once again I&#8217;m Black.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-3534 aligncenter\" alt=\"handigol 1\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-1.jpg\" width=\"338\" height=\"338\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-1.jpg 564w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-1-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-1-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 338px) 100vw, 338px\" \/><\/a> <em>Position after 40. f5. Black to move.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: 8\/p3bkp1\/4p3\/2pp1P2\/2p3P1\/r7\/5B2\/4R1K1 b &#8211; &#8211; 0 40<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s go to a question-and-answer format here.<\/p>\n<p>Q: <em>Where did all of White&#8217;s queenside pawns go?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A: It&#8217;s a long story, but the short version is simply that he moved all of his pieces to the kingside, so there was nobody left on the queenside to defend them.<\/p>\n<p>Q:<em> Why on Earth is White still playing?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A: That&#8217;s something I was wondering too. After I took his fourth pawn, I started wondering what it took to get this guy to resign. One possibility is that he was just waiting to finish the time control. I&#8217;ve done that sometimes, too &#8212; I just don&#8217;t want to make an impulsive decision to resign while my flag is hanging. Also, if Black were in\u00a0time trouble, there would have been some reason for White to play on.<\/p>\n<p>Q: <em>So were you in time trouble?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A: No! For a change I was ahead of my opponent. He had 1 minute left when he made his 40th move. I still had 12 minutes left.<\/p>\n<p>Q: <em>What happened next?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A: With 12 minutes available to me, I thought for about ten seconds at most, and played<strong> 40. &#8230; ef??????<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sorry about all the Brian Wall-style punctuation, but really this move deserves the Boner of the Year award. The instant after I took the pawn I saw what was wrong with it, but of course by then it was too late.<\/p>\n<p>My opponent, who had been looking totally disgusted with his position, suddenly became animated. He asked for my scoresheet, so he could copy down the last five moves, which he hadn&#8217;t recorded because he was in time trouble. Then he played the painfully obvious<strong> 41. Rxe7+! Kxe7 42. Bxc5+ Kf6 43. Bxa6 fg<\/strong> (diagram).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-3535 aligncenter\" alt=\"handigol 2\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-2.jpg\" width=\"338\" height=\"338\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-2.jpg 564w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-2-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/handigol-2-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 338px) 100vw, 338px\" \/><\/a> <em>Position after 43. &#8230; fg. White to move.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEN: 8\/p5p1\/5k2\/3p4\/2p3p1\/B7\/8\/6K1 w &#8211; &#8211; 0 44<\/p>\n<p>Here the chess gods took pity on me. Even though I have just played the sort of blunder that would ordinarily be fatal, I still have a winning position\u00a0because of all those pawns I won earlier. (Also, my active king helps.)\u00a0I&#8217;m sure glad that I was four pawns ahead before I made my mistake!<\/p>\n<p>In my somewhat shell-shocked state, I was also glad to see\u00a0that White has only a king and bishop left, so no matter how badly I screw up, at least I won&#8217;t lose. (For picky readers: Yes, I&#8217;m aware that a helpmate is possible here. But let&#8217;s be serious.)<\/p>\n<p>In fact, after <strong>44. Bb2+<\/strong> (for what it&#8217;s worth I think that 44. Bc5 a5 45. Kf2 is a better try, but it&#8217;s still only a matter of time) <strong>44. &#8230; Kf5 45. Bxg7 Ke4<\/strong> I won pretty easily.<\/p>\n<p>You might even say that my 40th move wasn&#8217;t such an awful blunder, it was just a way to liquidate material and get to another kind of winning endgame. That would be true if I had played my 40th move with that intention. But in reality, it was just a complete oversight. A Final-Round Folly. I should have just played 40. &#8230; Ra6, remaining four pawns ahead.<\/p>\n<p>Hope you enjoyed these positions, both the sublime and the ridiculous!<\/p>\n<p>A final taking stock: Although I was disappointed to once again fall slightly short of a 2200 rating in this tournament, I have to admit that my play just wasn&#8217;t master-class. Besides the near-death experience against Handigol, I had a bad loss against a 2400 player (meaning a game where I played like an idiot and he didn&#8217;t have to do anything great to win) and a\u00a0competitive loss against a 2200 player. True, I won a prize. But when you compare\u00a0my tournament\u00a0to the people I tied with, it&#8217;s really not even close. Uyanga Byambaa, Gabriel Bick, and Jason Cigan all got to 3\u00bd points with impressive wins over higher-rated players. By contrast, the only people I beat were people I was supposed to beat. I lost both of my games against higher-rated players.<\/p>\n<p>Another curious thing that has been going on this year is that I&#8217;m doing very well with Black and poorly with White. In two tournaments this year, my record as Black is now 5\u00bd-\u00bd and my record as White is 1\u00bd-3\u00bd. A semi-rational explanation is that I&#8217;ve mostly been getting White against higher-rated players and Black against lower-rated players. But that&#8217;s all the more reason why it&#8217;s disappointing that I have lost all these games to higher-rateds. I really had the opportunity to do better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For your viewing pleasure today, I give you four interesting positions from the 2015 Larry Evans Memorial. Two of them are from my games, and two are from other people. First, let&#8217;s look at the finish of the game that won the tournament. This was Andrew Karklins versus Alexander Ivanov in round four. Both players [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1363,16,12],"tags":[3186,302,298,1291,3178,1059,3184,2489,1247,238,3185,2574,173,237,2244],"class_list":["post-3530","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-current-news","category-positions","category-tournaments","tag-abhishek-handigol","tag-alexander-ivanov","tag-back-rank","tag-brian-wall","tag-chinguun-bayaraa","tag-discovered-attack","tag-folly","tag-larry-evans-memorial","tag-quiz","tag-ridiculous","tag-sidestep","tag-sublime","tag-tactics","tag-time-pressure","tag-uyanga-byambaa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3530"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3530\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3537,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3530\/revisions\/3537"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3530"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}