{"id":3189,"date":"2014-10-09T14:30:44","date_gmt":"2014-10-09T22:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3189"},"modified":"2014-10-09T14:37:59","modified_gmt":"2014-10-09T22:37:59","slug":"oh-the-shame","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=3189","title":{"rendered":"Oh, the Shame"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I just discovered that Shredder lets you see your &#8220;rating progress,&#8221; just as the USCF does.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-shot-2014-10-09-at-2.57.05-PM.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-3190 aligncenter\" alt=\"Screen shot 2014-10-09 at 2.57.05 PM\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-shot-2014-10-09-at-2.57.05-PM.png\" width=\"525\" height=\"419\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-shot-2014-10-09-at-2.57.05-PM.png 525w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-shot-2014-10-09-at-2.57.05-PM-300x239.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t know which to be more ashamed of&#8230; the fact that I have played more than 200 games against Shredder (that&#8217;s a lot of time-wasting, and it&#8217;s just in the last three months!) or the fact that my rating against it is only 2021.<\/p>\n<p>Some comments: In my first game I lost to Shredder set at 2350 (I believe). In my second game I beat it at a rating of 2180. That explains the huge rating spike after two games, when my rating went over 2250. I should have stopped then!<\/p>\n<p>There was then a prolonged trough as Shredder took advantage of my tactical inaccuracies and pounded me again and again.<\/p>\n<p>My gradual rating improvement is probably not due to any actual improvement in my play. Even though Shredder varies its openings a LOT, there are still a few that I have learned to take advantage of. For example, after 1. b4 I get a pretty good game every time with 1. &#8230; a5 2. b5 c5. In general, when Shredder&#8217;s rating is set below 2200 it tends to play goofball openings like 1. b4 and 1. &#8230; g5 more often than is healthy.<\/p>\n<p>Another reason for the rating improvement is that more and more I have begun to ignore it when my flag falls. Shredder does not rate the game unless and until somebody resigns or is checkmated or a draw happens. So if my flag falls, I keep on playing. I&#8217;ve gotten many, many wins and draws that way. In one sense this is useful for training; one reason I started playing Shredder at &#8220;weakened&#8221; settings is that I wanted to practice winning superior positions. So instead of game in 10 minutes, the ground rules have been more like this. After 10 minutes I get either a won, lost, or drawn position. After that, I take my time and try to bring home the 1 point or\u00a0\u00bd point. If I&#8217;m lost and my flag is down, I just resign.<\/p>\n<p>By the way, Shredder also plays on after its flag falls. So it&#8217;s not as if I&#8217;m the only one.<\/p>\n<p>There is one obvious disadvantage to this &#8220;training technique&#8221; &#8212; when I play in a tournament I won&#8217;t have the same luxury of ignoring the flag. But hopefully I will be able to adjust my thinking accordingly. We&#8217;ll see!<\/p>\n<p>P.S. My wife saw the title and wondered, of course, what the shame was. When I told her it was that I had played 200 games against the computer, she understood perfectly. In fact, she added her own embellishment: &#8220;&#8230; When you should have been keeping up with cr** around the house!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>(Two hundred chess games is a lot of dishes not washed&#8230;)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I just discovered that Shredder lets you see your &#8220;rating progress,&#8221; just as the USCF does. I don&#8217;t know which to be more ashamed of&#8230; the fact that I have played more than 200 games against Shredder (that&#8217;s a lot of time-wasting, and it&#8217;s just in the last three months!) or the fact that my [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[235,25,171],"tags":[1869,2995,85,1245,1049],"class_list":["post-3189","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-off-topic","category-people","category-ruminations","tag-computer-chess","tag-marital-advice","tag-ratings","tag-shredder","tag-training"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3189","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3189"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3189\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3194,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3189\/revisions\/3194"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3189"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3189"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3189"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}