{"id":30,"date":"2007-11-05T10:59:37","date_gmt":"2007-11-05T18:59:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=30"},"modified":"2007-11-05T10:59:37","modified_gmt":"2007-11-05T18:59:37","slug":"round-robin-bliss-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=30","title":{"rendered":"Round Robin Bliss, part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Round 2 of the Santa Cruz Cup was yesterday, and already it was a very important game for me: I had Black against the top seed, Juan Diego Perea. As you might remember from my previous &#8220;Round Robin Bliss&#8221; post, Juande and I agreed to be co-champions last year after a playoff where we tied 1-1 in 25-minute games, then tied 1-1 in 10-minute games, then tied 1-1 in 5-minute games, with Black winning every game. So I guess it\u00c2\u00a0was a good\u00c2\u00a0omen that I had Black in this game. And sure enough, the pattern continued! But not without a few heart-stopping moments.<\/p>\n<p>I botched the opening beyond belief, and we arrived at the following position:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/pereamackenzie1.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/pereamackenzie1.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This is one of those positions where White has an embarrassment of riches. He has two moves that both look terrific: 18. Rd1 or 18. Nd4&#8230; but which one to play? After a long think, Juande played 18. Rd1. It&#8217;s hard to call this a mistake, but according to the computer 18. Nd4 Nfd7 (which I was intending to play) 19. Ne6! fe 20. Rxe6 is winning. Black has to choose between giving up the rook on a8 or giving up the queen to a discovered check. Black can avoid this with 18. &#8230; c6, but he just loses a pawn with no compensation after 19. Nxc6 Nxc6 20. Bxc6.<\/p>\n<p>After 18. Rd1 I played 18. &#8230; Nbd7, and again White has a decision to make. We both saw that Black is threatening to win two rooks for his queen with 19. &#8230; Nxe5 20. Rxd8 Nxf3+ followed by 21. &#8230; Raxd8. But somehow we both missed the fact that 19. Bg5! prevents this combination. Now after 19. &#8230; Nxe5 20. Rd8 Nxf3+ 21. Qxf3! Raxd8 22. Bxf6 wins a piece.<\/p>\n<p>Juande said that he intended to play 19. Bg5 immediately, but then he\u00c2\u00a0changed his mind because he couldn&#8217;t see an advantage after\u00c2\u00a019. &#8230; Nxe5. Finally he played 19. Bf4? instead. The game continued 19. &#8230; c6 20. Re3 Nd5, and it was clear that I had &#8220;dodged the bullet.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The next interesting position came on the very last move of the time control:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/pereamackenzie2.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/pereamackenzie2.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>White has just played 40. h5, and with about 50 seconds left on my clock I played 40. &#8230; gh!, which I believe is the best move. The interesting thing is that this is a lesson I have learned from playing the computer. Five years ago, before I bought Fritz, I probably would not have considered a move like 40. &#8230; gh because it seems to mess up Black&#8217;s pawns too much. But on many occasions I have seen the computer snatch a pawn like this against me, and somehow I never quite manage to get it back. This game provides a beautiful illustration of the theme.<\/p>\n<p>Eventually I won Juande&#8217;s a-pawn and he won my f-pawn, and we got into a pawn race where we both made queens. Here&#8217;s the position after move 66:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/pereamackenzie3.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/pereamackenzie3.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here Juande played a little too fast and did not put up the best resistance. He played 67. Qxb2+? and lost quickly. The computer spots the move 67. Kf5, which saves White a tempo. Unfortunately, he is still one tempo too slow to draw the game. Here is how the winning line goes for Black: 67. Kf5 Qxe5+ 68. Kxe5 Kb2 69. Ke6 Kc3 70. f7 Ra8 71. Ke7 Kd4 72. f8Q Rxf8 73. Kxf8 Ke4 74. Kg7 Kf3 75. Kh6 Kg4!\u00c2\u00a0 This position really deserves a diagram:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/pereamackenzie4.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/pereamackenzie4.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s the ultimate triumph of those lame doubled h-pawns that I created at move 40. The pawn on h7 is key, because it prevents White from playing 77. Kg6, which would be a draw. Maybe I should do a ChessLecture on this theme sometime, called &#8220;Doubled Pawns are Not That Bad.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Whew! What a battle! This was a great birthday present (yesterday was my 49th birthday).<\/p>\n<p>While I&#8217;m on the topic of &#8220;round robin bliss,&#8221; I have to mention that the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nachess.org\/fide\/\">North American FIDE Invitational <\/a>in Chicago finished this weekend. My fellow ChessLecturer, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chesslecture.com\/mtm.php\">David Vigorito<\/a>, led most of the way, but the 12-year-old <em>wunderkind<\/em> Roy Robson caught him at the end and scored his first IM norm, with 7 points out of 9! This kid has really taken off in the last year or so. I hope that David will eventually present a lecture on one of Robson&#8217;s games from this event, but for now you can check out Eugene Perelshteyn&#8217;s excellent lecture from August 23, &#8220;Losing to Boy Genius.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Round 2 of the Santa Cruz Cup was yesterday, and already it was a very important game for me: I had Black against the top seed, Juan Diego Perea. As you might remember from my previous &#8220;Round Robin Bliss&#8221; post, Juande and I agreed to be co-champions last year after a playoff where we tied [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,10,11,9,12],"tags":[44,43,45],"class_list":["post-30","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chess-lecture","category-endings","category-games","category-openings","category-tournaments","tag-birthday","tag-doubled-pawns","tag-genius"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}