![\"ratings](\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/ratings-graph.png\")
<\/a>The last time I was over 2200 was after the World Open in 1995, before I even moved to California. For the longest time my rating just seemed to go down and down, but just maybe I’m starting to see a smile at the other end of this graph. After last weekend, my rating has now risen to 2171, its highest level since 1997. It’s conceivable that I’m just one good tournament away from getting back into master territory. That may not matter much to you, but it does to me. Although I have a Life Master title, for the most part people don’t see the title. They see the rating.<\/p>\nHowever, the articles I’ve been reading at the U.S. Chess Online website make me wonder how real any of this is. They’ve been making little changes to the “K” and “B” coefficients to make ratings a little more volatile for experts and to correct for the ratings deflation that began… around 1997. So that whole long period of decline that you see in the graph may just have been a result of the countrywide ratings deflation. And my increase over the last couple of years may just be a result of the changes to “K” and “B”.<\/p>\n
While browsing my statistics I noticed a couple other interesting things. One is that at the Reno tournament I played three of my most common opponents: my sixth game against Ed Formanek (+2 -3 =1), my fifth against Michael Langer (+2 -3), and my fourth against Theodore Biyiasis (+3 = 1).<\/p>\n
I knew that I had played several games against Ed, dating all the way back to my first year in Ohio. He lives in Las Vegas now, so he’s the only person whom I’ve played several times in two different parts of the country. I was totally shocked to see that I have played five games against Langer. Before our game last weekend, he asked, “Didn’t we play once before?” and I said, “Yes, I think so.” Turns out we had played four times before! Who knew?<\/p>\n
Another interesting thing you can look at is your results by 100-point rating category of your opponents. In this tournament I played my 100th game against a 2200-2299 player. In fact, Mr. Formanek was lucky number 100. I’ve played only 82 games against players in the 2100-2199 range, and 129 against players in the 2000-2099 range. It’s an oddity of the Swiss System that you’ll play most of your games against people who are either well below you or well above you, and fewer against people who are very close to your strength. I remember that during the brief period when I was over 2200, I played a lot of experts and hardly any masters.<\/p>\n