{"id":2805,"date":"2014-03-03T09:33:27","date_gmt":"2014-03-03T17:33:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=2805"},"modified":"2014-03-03T09:33:27","modified_gmt":"2014-03-03T17:33:27","slug":"tabiyah-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=2805","title":{"rendered":"Tabiyah Time!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A &#8220;tabiyah&#8221; is an opening position that arises when both sides play their &#8220;most natural&#8221; moves, or a position that can arise from a multitude of different move orders. In many cases it is arrived by mutual consent, although this doesn&#8217;t have to be the case. And it&#8217;s usually a position where one side or the other has to make his\/her first substantive decision. So it&#8217;s like the point where the game really begins.<\/p>\n<p>In my last tournament, the Bay Area International in January, I got to the same position in two games (both of which I lost) without really realizing it was a tabiyah. It&#8217;s a position from what one might call the Quiet Variation of the Two Knights&#8217; Defense, the 4. d3 variation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>John Bryant\/Steve Breckinridge vs. Dana Mackenzie<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d3 Be7 5. Bb3 &#8230;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Although I&#8217;ve played this variation (4. &#8230; Be7) on many occasions, I had never seen this particular move order before. White spends a tempo to reposition his bishop to b3 (and eventually c2) more quickly. The upside of this is that he keeps the two bishops. The downside is that, well, he spends a tempo. Can Black take advantage of this? Does the move order even matter?<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. &#8230; O-O 6. O-O d6<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A more direct attempt at refutation is 6. &#8230; d5. Of course, White hasn&#8217;t really made any mistakes so it is hazardous for Black to think about &#8220;refuting&#8221; White&#8217;s fifth move.<\/p>\n<p><strong>7. c3 &#8230;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>And here we are at the tabiyah.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2806\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2806\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2806\" alt=\"Position after 7. c3. Black to move.\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah-300x300.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah.jpg 498w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2806\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Position after 7. c3. Black to move.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>FEN: r1bq1rk1\/ppp1bppp\/2np1n2\/4p3\/4P3\/1BPP1N2\/PP3PPP\/RNBQ1RK1 b &#8211; &#8211; 0 7<\/p>\n<p>Now it&#8217;s time for Black to make a plan. A lot of his decision revolves around where to develop his remaining piece, the queen bishop.<\/p>\n<p>By the way, it&#8217;s probably no accident that Breckinridge played this against me. He probably saw how I botched it against Bryant in round one and decided to see if I would botch it the same way against him.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s do what I couldn&#8217;t do during the games and take a look at the moves most frequently played in ChessBase.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(A)<\/strong> <strong>7. &#8230; Na5.<\/strong> Played 668 times, score (for Black) 44.5 percent. This is the simplest and most solid. Black chases the bishop to c2, follows up with 8. &#8230; c5 and gets a Ruy Lopez-like position. Why didn&#8217;t I play this either time? Well, I just wasn&#8217;t sure whether you&#8217;re &#8220;supposed&#8221; to play a Ruy Lopez without &#8230; a6 and &#8230; b5! This may have been an acceptable excuse against Bryant, but certainly after that game I should have done my homework, looked up the line in ChessBase and realized that 7. &#8230; Na5 is the usual move. But I didn&#8217;t do that, because I didn&#8217;t expect to play this position again for another 20 years. Instead, I saw it two days later! There&#8217;s a pretty good moral here. In big-time chess (and the Bay Area International is somewhat big-time) people prepare for you and pounce on your weaknesses.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(B) 7. &#8230; h6.<\/strong> Played 401 times, score 40.0 percent. This move is somewhat abstract, but its flexibility is also its main point. Black might play &#8230; Be6 or might play &#8230; Bg4, and in either case the move &#8230; h6 is useful. In the former case it keeps White&#8217;s knight out of g5, and in the latter case it gives the bishop a possible flight square on h7.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(C) 7. &#8230; Bg4.<\/strong> Played 381 times, score 28.6 percent. This is the move I played against Bryant. I was surprised to see how poorly this natural-looking move scores in practice, but in retrospect I think I understand it. This move is useful in Ruy Lopez variations where White plays d2-d4 and omits h2-h3. However, if White has played d2-d3, the move makes no threats. Black risks getting his bishop kicked with h3; he doesn&#8217;t really want to take on f3, and if the bishop drops back to h5 it might eventually get chased with g2-g4. Black has essentially jump-started White&#8217;s kingside attack for him. No wonder Breckinridge wanted to see if I would enter this variation again!<\/p>\n<p><strong>(D) 7. &#8230; Be6.<\/strong> Played 159 times, score 35.5 percent. This is probably what I am going to play next time. It&#8217;s consistent with my opening philosophy of playing moves that are not the most popular but are perfectly good. And there&#8217;s more to it than that. Black is more or less inviting White to play 8. Bxe6 fe 9. Qb3, and on this move I&#8217;m planning to sacrifice a pawn with 9. &#8230; Qd7!?<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2807\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2807\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2807\" alt=\"Position after 9. ... Qd7. White to move.\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah2-300x300.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah2-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah2-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah2.jpg 498w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2807\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Position after 9. &#8230; Qd7. White to move.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>FEN: r4rk1\/pppqb1pp\/2nppn2\/4p3\/4P3\/1QPP1N2\/PP3PPP\/RNB2RK1 w &#8211; &#8211; 0 10<\/p>\n<p>We are now into the ultra-rare realm. Black usually plays the ugly, passive 9. &#8230; Qc8, and the natural pawn sac 9. &#8230; Qd7 has been played in only one game (White didn&#8217;t accept). Analyzing the position with Rybka, I believe that Black has very good compensation for the pawn. Rybka evaluates the position at about +0.3 for White, meaning that it doesn&#8217;t quite believe Black has full compensation, but I think it&#8217;s good enough for rock and roll. White gets to feel very uncomfortable on the kingside. Meanwhile, if White doesn&#8217;t take the pawn on move 10, Black has solved all of his opening problems. 10. Ng4 is met by 10. &#8230; Nd8. Otherwise, Black is just ahead in development and White&#8217;s queen is somewhat misplaced on b3.<\/p>\n<p>I like this line! A more or less sound pawn sac that is unknown to theory!<\/p>\n<p>(E)<strong> 7. &#8230; d5. <\/strong>Played 111 times, score 55.0 percent! The good record of this move, a positive score for Black, is a strong argument in its favor. It seems surprising at first sight, playing &#8230; d5 immediately after playing &#8230; d6, but the point is that White&#8217;s move 7. c3 has weakened the d3 square and also deprived the queen knight of c3, thereby weakening White&#8217;s control over the d5 square.<\/p>\n<p>To me, the most thematic continuation goes as follows: <strong>8. ed Nxd5 9. Re1 Bg4 10. h3 Bh5 11. g4 Bg6<\/strong> (diagram).<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2808\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah3.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2808\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2808\" alt=\"Position after 11. ... Bg6. White to move.\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah3-300x300.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah3-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah3-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/tabiyah3.jpg 498w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2808\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Position after 11. &#8230; Bg6. White to move.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>FEN: r2q1rk1\/ppp1bppp\/2n3b1\/3np3\/6P1\/1BPP1N1P\/PP3P2\/RNBQR1K1 w &#8211; &#8211; 0 12<\/p>\n<p>The lines are clearly drawn here. Black believes that his superior mobility, the weakness of the d3 square, and the weakness of White&#8217;s kingside give him sufficient compensation for the pawn after 12. Nxe5 Nxe5 13. Rxe5. This position has been played by some heavy hitters for Black: grandmasters Fressinet, Ragger, and Handoko.<\/p>\n<p>One thing makes me uneasy, though. In the lines I&#8217;ve gone over with Rybka, Black&#8217;s compensation tends to disappear. Rybka does not like this pawn sac as much as the pawn sacrifice in variation (D). I know that Rybka is not the same as a human opponent, but still it makes you wonder.<\/p>\n<p>I think I will try variation (E) sometime too, if I&#8217;m given the opportunity, but I want to try (D) first.<\/p>\n<p>FInally, let&#8217;s skip down to the 14-th most popular move in the tabiyah:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(N) 7. &#8230; b6. <\/strong>Played 3 times, score 16.7 percent. This is what I played against Breckinridge, because I was at my wit&#8217;s end. I still didn&#8217;t know whether 7. &#8230; Na5 was considered good, and I didn&#8217;t want to repeat my 7. &#8230; Bg4 debacle against Bryant, so I had to find some other move. This was the one I picked. Ironically, Rybka does not consider it a bad move at all. It&#8217;s perfectly playable. But the real problem was that I had nothing even resembling a plan. White got his usual &#8220;Spanish torture&#8221; attack on the kingside and I had no pressure anywhere. I tried busting the position open with &#8230; d5, which was extremely ill-advised because open lines go to the player who is better developed, and that was White. Bottom line, even though Rybka says it&#8217;s okay, I&#8217;m never going to play 7. &#8230; b6 again. You&#8217;re welcome to try it if you want.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A &#8220;tabiyah&#8221; is an opening position that arises when both sides play their &#8220;most natural&#8221; moves, or a position that can arise from a multitude of different move orders. In many cases it is arrived by mutual consent, although this doesn&#8217;t have to be the case. And it&#8217;s usually a position where one side or [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[11,9,16,1],"tags":[2743,2820,2822,2824,2160,1376,2823,648,1151,2821,695],"class_list":["post-2805","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-games","category-openings","category-positions","category-uncategorized","tag-bay-area-international","tag-flexible","tag-fressinet","tag-handoko","tag-john-bryant","tag-pawn-sacrifice","tag-ragger","tag-ruy-lopez","tag-rybka","tag-steven-breckinridge","tag-two-knights-defense"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2805","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2805"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2805\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2810,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2805\/revisions\/2810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}