{"id":262,"date":"2008-07-20T16:27:10","date_gmt":"2008-07-21T00:27:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=262"},"modified":"2008-07-20T16:31:50","modified_gmt":"2008-07-21T00:31:50","slug":"chess-salon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=262","title":{"rendered":"Chess salon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last night I invited a few of my chess friends over for an evening devoted to chess. Borrowing a term from a century ago, one could perhaps call it a &#8220;chess salon.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The evening&#8217;s first entertainment was a recent Chess Lecture (the one by Eugene Perelshteyn that I <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/?p=232\">raved about here<\/a>). Then we ordered out for some overpriced pizza. (Since when do two large pizzas cost $50? Good grief!) Kay made some apple crisp for dessert, which was a big hit. Then we looked at a game that I&#8217;m going to\u00c2\u00a0discuss in\u00c2\u00a0a ChessLecture later this week. We found a few interesting variations but also overlooked a few; let&#8217;s say it was fun but not necessarily high-quality analysis. Finally, we played doubles chess until midnight. In doubles you have a partner and you alternate moves. It&#8217;s a lot of fun when you have a clash of styles or ideas on the same team &#8212; sometimes you wonder, &#8220;<em>What<\/em> is my partner <em>thinking<\/em>?!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The people who came to the chess salon were Gjon Feinstein, Thadeus Frei (who, as some of you might have noticed, has recently written a few comments on this blog), Cole Ryan, and Dan Burkhard. I invited Juande Perea, too, but his wife is expected to give birth any day now &#8212; her due date is\u00c2\u00a0tomorrow &#8211;\u00c2\u00a0so he decided it was too big of a gamble for him to come. Or maybe his wife decided for him! I don&#8217;t know.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether\u00c2\u00a0I\u00c2\u00a0have mentioned Gjon\u00c2\u00a0previously in this blog, but if not I should have. He is one of the people who keeps the Santa Cruz chess scene going. He&#8217;s a national master who has not played tournament chess in about 15 years, in part (I think) because it doesn&#8217;t agree with his nerves, but more importantly because he has dedicated himself to a career as a chess coach.<\/p>\n<p>Making a living off of chess is a hard, hard road to travel, but Gjon makes it work somehow. He teaches chess\u00c2\u00a0at several local schools, gives private lessons, and also runs a few scholastic tournaments every year. I think he does a few things on the side to supplement his income, such as pet-sitting, but basically he is a chess coach. If you&#8217;re a young player in the Santa Cruz area and you&#8217;re looking to improve, he is the go-to guy.<\/p>\n<p>Although Gjon doesn&#8217;t play tournament chess any more, he loves to play blitz. I would guess that his strength at 5-minute chess is probably at least 2400. He grew up in the Northeast and played a lot at Washington Square Park in New York, where you had to move fast and be good at tactics if you wanted to hang onto your money. So he&#8217;s got an extremely high level of tactical alertness, and he&#8217;s impossible to outrace in a time scramble. If\u00c2\u00a0we have an even position, but\u00c2\u00a0he has\u00c2\u00a010 seconds left and\u00c2\u00a0I have 20 or 30,\u00c2\u00a0then I might as well resign. He can play 20 moves in those 10 seconds and they will be good, strong moves with no obvious blunders. I can&#8217;t possibly play 20 good moves in 20 seconds. Somehow he has an algorithm for understanding what is going on really fast, and I don&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>My wife noticed it, too. She commented this morning, &#8220;Gjon&#8217;s got a lot between his ears.&#8221;\u00c2\u00a0She noticed it because in some of our team games last night we decided to allow discussion between teammates. While Dan and Thadeus and Cole and I would say, &#8220;I like move x because it threatens y,&#8221; in the same amount of time Gjon would say &#8220;I like move\u00c2\u00a0a followed by b, c, d, e.&#8221; He would be looking five ply ahead in the time it took us to look two. He would also have sound strategic reasons for his moves, too &#8212; it wasn&#8217;t all tactics. It seems to me that he is fluent in chess, while I stumble along as if\u00c2\u00a0it were my second language.<\/p>\n<p>To be more precise: I think that Gjon&#8217;s tactical fluency probably developed from playing a lot, with fast time controls,\u00c2\u00a0and against tough opposition as a kid or as\u00c2\u00a0a teenager. I think that his strategical soundness has come later, through study and\u00c2\u00a0hard work as a chess coach. Coaching or teaching force you to put your chess under a microscope and confront the things you don&#8217;t understand.<\/p>\n<p>So, I&#8217;m sure it will come as no surprise when I tell you that the star move of the night was Gjon&#8217;s. In one of our team games, Gjon and Dan Burkhard versus me and Thadeus Frei, we got to this position:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/07\/salon.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/07\/salon.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here Thadeus has just played 1. &#8230; Kb8, attacking the rook on a7. Gjon replied with <font color=\"#ff0000\">2. R6a6!!<\/font> This threatens 3. Ra8 mate. Also, notice that if Black plays 2. &#8230; ba, White still gets to play 3. Ra8 mate, with the rook defended by a different piece! So I played <font color=\"#ff0000\">2. &#8230; c6<\/font>; what else could I do? Now it was Dan&#8217;s move, and he slightly missed the point by playing <font color=\"#ff0000\">3. Ra8+?<\/font> After the game, Gjon showed us the\u00c2\u00a0second\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0half of his beautiful idea: 3. Qe5+ Kc8 4. Rxc6+! forcing mate in a couple moves. 3. Ra8+ should still be good enough to win, but they were very low on time, and if my memory serves correctly, Thadeus and I actually survived long enough to win on time.<\/p>\n<p>You might wonder why Dan played 3. Ra8+\u00c2\u00a0if they were allowed to talk about their moves. Well, what happened was that he played the move and punched the clock just as Gjon was saying, &#8220;No, no, no!&#8221; but by then it was too late. Anyhow, I was impressed by the way that Gjon saw all of this with so little time left, while the rest of us had no clue.<\/p>\n<p>By the way, I was also impressed with Thadeus&#8217;s play. I don&#8217;t think he made a single bad mistake all night &#8211;\u00c2\u00a0or at least\u00c2\u00a0he made fewer than I did! The only weakness I saw in his game was a tendency to react defensively when his opponent makes a threat. It&#8217;s a natural tendency, of course,\u00c2\u00a0but what you really need to do is <em>see <\/em>your opponent&#8217;s threats and then find a way to creatively ignore them, and make him react to your threats instead. That&#8217;s not always possible, but it should always be your first objective.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last night I invited a few of my chess friends over for an evening devoted to chess. Borrowing a term from a century ago, one could perhaps call it a &#8220;chess salon.&#8221; The evening&#8217;s first entertainment was a recent Chess Lecture (the one by Eugene Perelshteyn that I raved about here). Then we ordered out [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,11,25,16],"tags":[509,145,510,508,507],"class_list":["post-262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chess-lecture","category-games","category-people","category-positions","tag-apple-crisp","tag-blitz","tag-fluency","tag-pizza","tag-washington-square"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danamackenzie.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}