Guide to the Cosmos, gold, New Scientist

Monday, January 11th, 2010

As of today, I’m on a podcast! Check out “Guide to the Cosmos,” a podcast hosted by Dr. Robert Piccioni, at www.guidetothecosmos.com. It was actually Christmas Eve Day when we recorded this interview over the phone, and it’s a two-parter. The first part, in today’s episode, is about water on the moon, and I talk all about the recent discoveries by Chandrayaan-1 and LCROSS. The second part is about the origin of the moon, and that part of the interview will air in February.

The audio part of the podcast is actually on a different site, called WebTalkRadio. You can go to their main site, www.webtalkradio.net, and then look for “Guide to the Cosmos” under the “Show podcasts” tab. But I’ll make it easy for you and give you a direct link. Dr. Piccioni also puts some images up on his own website to go with the podcast, which you can look at here as you listen to the interview.

When I recorded the interview I did not know which images he was going to have up on his website, so I wasn’t able to refer to them directly. Let me fill in that gap here. Image #1 shows the impact plume from LCROSS’s crash into the Cabeus crater.

Cabeus impact plume

This cloud of debris was not visible from Earth. The photo was taken from the “shepherding satellite” that passed directly overhead and crashed into the moon 4 minutes later. The spectrometers on the shepherding satellite analyzed both the absorbed and emitted light from this cloud to look for traces of water and other compounds. Image #2 is just a pretty picture of the full moon, nothing else. The LCROSS impact happened way down at the bottom of that picture, in the bumpy area around the south pole. Image #3 is a “wiggly line” from the ultraviolet and visible spectrometer.

Spectrum showing sodium emission line plus something interesting

Interestingly, this is not the data set that Tony Colaprete, the main project scientist, has talked about the most. Unlike the near infrared spectrometer, whose readings they understand pretty well and which show definitive evidence of water, the UV/VIS spectrum requires more interpretation and they are just beginning to work on it. The peak on the right is actually not water but sodium. (This emission band looks yellow to the naked eye, and explains why a sodium lamp is yellow. See this Wikipedia entry to read more about it.)

You can also see two shorter peaks on the left that have not been identified yet. At the AGU meeting in December, Tony said they think that one of them could be gold! Yes, gold on the moon. You read about it here first.

Back in the days before Apollo went to the moon, there was a slightly kooky scientist named Tommy Gold who said that the moon was covered by a layer of dust so deep that any spacecraft that landed on the moon would just sink into it and never be seen again. Fortunately, this didn’t turn out to be the case, but for a while NASA had to take the possibility seriously, and his hypothetical surface layer became known as “Gold dust.” But now lunar gold dust may take on a whole new meaning!

I did not report on this earlier (“LCROSS Strikes Gold!”) because they really don’t know what the peaks are yet, and so Tony’s comment was at least partly meant in jest. If they ever get more serious about it, I’ll be sure to let you know.

Last month I wrote an article for New Scientist online about the moon sessions at the AGU meeting, called “Are We Looking in the Wrong Places for Water on the Moon?” This was a very ticklish article to write, but I was happy with it in the end. Basically, the story is that one of the instruments on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has been seeing lots of indications of water in places where it isn’t supposed to be.

LCROSS went to a permanently shadowed crater because that is where theory says that lunar water, if it exists, should concentrate. It went to Cabeus, in particular, because that is where the Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND) on LRO saw the highest concentrations of water. But what’s interesting, and controversial, is that LEND has seen no correlation so far between permanent shadowing and hydrogen deposits! There are other regions with just as much water as Cabeus that aren’t in shadow.

What made the article ticklish to write is that there are some people who frankly don’t believe the LEND data yet. I tried to hint at this without pouring oil onto the fire. But there are three groups–one in Russia, two in the U.S.–who are working on the LEND data and they all are saying pretty much the same thing. You can’t just ignore this fact and pretend it isn’t there, while at the same time singing the praises of LCROSS and the LRO camera and the other experiments on LRO. That’s why I felt it was important to write this article, even if the jury is still out on what the results mean.

In a blog I think I can be more adventurous than I can in print, so I’ll hazard a guess as to what it might mean. The LCROSS results are hinting that there is way more water than you can produce by bombarding the moon’s surface with the solar wind–some of the water has to be from meteoroids or comets. LEND can see beneath the surface, and Igor Mitrofanov, the principal investigator for LEND, says that he thinks they are seeing deposits of hydrogen that lie beneath the surface, covered by a layer of dry soil. Putting two and two together, I think that the water is delivered by meteoroids/comets, and is then buried by some process we don’t understand yet (or maybe it’s just in a sufficiently thick layer to begin with?). Once it’s buried, it doesn’t need a permanently shadowed crater to keep it from evaporating. Sure, it might be associated with a permanently shadowed crater, but really any crater will do. Or maybe even something that isn’t a crater! One of the most puzzling things about the LEND data was that one of the hydrogen deposits seemed to be on one side of a mountain range. But maybe that makes sense, if the mountain range was created by the meteoroid/comet impact.

Well, this is just my feeble amateur speculation. The specialists will, of course, hash it out and either come up with an explanation, or agree to disagree. One thing that’s pretty certain is that there is a lot we don’t know yet.

Tags: Chandrayaan-1, hydrogen, LCROSS, LEND, lunar origin, New Scientist, podcast, Robert Piccioni, Thomas Gold, water, WebTalkRadio
Posted in Media, Meetings, Missions, NASA, Science, websites | 2 Comments »

Water on the Moon — Bring your Buckets!

Friday, November 13th, 2009

As usual, the LCROSS press conference had a lot of Power Point slides, but probably the most memorable thing about it was an empty 2-gallon industrial bucket. Tony Colaprete, the lead scientist for the mission, said: “I’m here today to tell you that yes, indeed, we found water on the moon, and we didn’t just find a little, but we found a significant amount.” Then he held up the bucket. ”In the 20-30 meter wide impact crater that LCROSS made, we found about a dozen of these 2-gallon buckets. And that is probably a lower bound.”

Let me back up and give a little bit of context. Earlier missions, Clementine and Lunar Prospector, had found evidence for water ice but no direct proof. This year, three different missions simultaneously reported proof of water ice, because they detected not just the spectral signature of hydrogen (H) but also the hydroxyl molecule (OH). [It doesn't take too much knowledge of chemistry to see that hydrogen, H, plus hydroxyl, OH, equals water, HOH.] Not only that, the hydroxyl comes and goes over the course of a lunar day, which suggests that there is some chemistry going on at the moon’s surface. Carle Pieters, the principal investigator for the Chandrayaan-1 mission’s Moon Mineralogy Mapper, estimated that you could get a liter of water from a football field-sized area of the moon’s surface. This was exciting news, but as a reality check, it still makes the moon drier than Earth’s driest desert.

LCROSS has found an oasis in the desert. It was targeted for a specific crater near the south pole, Cabeus, where remote sensors had detected a high concentration of hydrogen. It excavated a 30-meter crater, only a third the size of a football field. Within that region, it dug up not just a liter of water, but 100 liters. Again, for context, one reporter asked Colaprete how this compares with Earth’s driest deserts. He said, “If you stand on that beach [the sandy spot where LCROSS impacted], I can say that it is wetter than some deserts on Earth.”

Does this contradict the Chandrayaan-1 findings? Of course not. It just re-emphasizes how little we know. Chandrayaan-1′s measurements were taken over a broad swath of the moon. By comparison, LCROSS is just looking at a tiny pinprick on the surface. Also, Chandrayaan-1 was measuring only the water that is right at the surface, up to a few microns deep. On the other hand, LCROSS excavated to several meters below the surface. To me that was one of the most exciting things about LCROSS; unlike measurements from orbit, it really sees what is underground. (However, it turns out that I was not entirely correct when I thought that LCROSS would be the first mission to do this. Radar measurements can penetrate one or two meters. Chandrayaan-1 carried a radar instrument on board, but those results have not been published yet. When they do get published, Paul Spudis promises me that they will be good.)

So basically, we now have one data point where we had zero before. We know that at one particular location, we have found an oasis. It remains to be seen exactly how concentrated the water ice is there, how heterogeneous it is, how hard it is to find other areas with lots of water, how deeply it is buried, etc. Not only that, there is a whole new suite of questions: How does water get to the moon? Once it’s there, how does it get transported to the poles? There are lots of theories, and at this point absolutely no way to choose among them.

What we have here is the appearance, in less than two months (since Pieters’ paper), of a whole new field of science that didn’t exist before: lunar hydrology. The next step, of course, will be for the LCROSS team to continue analyzing their data and nail down the concentration of water at their impact site. Also, LRO (the Lunar Reconnaissance Observer) will continue making large-scale observations  to figure out where else on the moon we might find water. But then, if we’re really serious about following up on this discovery, the next step needs to be a lunar rover (or even several of them) to poke around these permanently shadowed craters and start answering the questions in the previous paragraph.

There was one other very interesting thing mentioned at the press conference, which Colaprete was clearly eager to say more about but he just doesn’t have the data yet. LCROSS found lots of other volatile elements in the debris plume and/or the vapor cloud released by the impact. These may include:

• carbon dioxide
• methane
• methanol
• ethanol
• ammonia
• other organic molecules

The case for these is not as clear yet as the case for water. Colaprete said that it is absolutely certain that some of them are present, but they can’t yet pin down which ones and in what amounts. The science team is going to continue working hard to answer those questions, but they felt that the detection of water was so clear and of such overriding importance that they voted to go public with it now (instead of waiting another month, as per the original plan). But still, stay tuned for news about these other volatile compounds, because this story ain’t over yet.

Tags: buckets, carbon dioxide, Carle Pieters, Chandrayaan-1, hydrology, LCROSS, LRO, methane, oasis, Paul Spudis, Tony Colaprete, volatile compounds, water
Posted in Media, Missions, NASA, Science | No Comments »

LCROSS Results Tomorrow

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Last month the LCROSS satellite crashed into a crater near the Moon’s south pole, in an experiment designed to look for water ice. At that time the principal investigator, Tony Colaprete, said that they would probably announce the results from the mission within two months. Well, they’ve beaten that timeline by a month. Tomorrow there will be a press conference at NASA Ames at 9:00 am Pacific time (12 noon Eastern time) to announce the first findings.

As I wrote in my previous post, the LCROSS impact was sort of a dud from the point of view of public relations.  It was not possible to see the debris plume from an amateur telescope, as the mission planners had hoped. Nevertheless, the instruments on the spacecraft definitely did see the debris. Thus, from an engineering point of view, the mission was a success. They landed the spacecraft where they wanted to land it and they got data.

So that leaves one more question: Was the mission a success scientifically? And in particular, did they find water? That’s the question that I am almost certain will be answered, one way or another, tomorrow. And of course it is the most important question from the viewpoint of future exploration of the moon.

I don’t have any inside information, but Tony Colaprete did say this in an e-mail to me a couple weeks ago: “We have a wonderful data set … It amazes me a little more each and every day.” Read into those tea leaves whatever you will!

In related news, Colaprete and other members of the LCROSS and LRO missions are going to present their early results next week in Houston, at the annual meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group. Of course the press conference tomorrow will cover anything really big and important, but I’m sure there will be many more details and more discussion at the Houston meeting.

Fortunately, New Scientist has commissioned me to write an article about the status of the lunar water question, taking into account all the results that have been announced this year, from Kaguya to Chandrayaan-1 to LRO and LCROSS. I will attend the Houston meeting, and this will give me a chance to do lots of interviews.

I think we are now at a crossroads in lunar exploration. We’ve gotten a big influx of new data this year, with tantalizing signs that there is more water than we expected on the moon. Now is the time for planning the next steps. Do we shrug our shoulders? Do we invest $3 billion more into the NASA manned flight program, as the Augustine Commission suggested? Do we plan new robotic missions? If so, what should they do?

Lots of questions. Hopefully I’ll find out a few answers, starting tomorrow.

Tags: Houston, LCROSS, LEAG, New Scientist, Tony Colaprete, water
Posted in Media, Missions, NASA, Science | No Comments »

LRO’s “BFF”

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

The second of the two moon missions that NASA launched in June is called LCROSS, an acronym for Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite. According to Tony Colaprete, the chief scientist for the LCROSS mission, “The younger folks at Goddard Space Flight Center have started calling it LRO’s BFF… at least until October 9.”

Hmmm… I can see some puzzled looks out there. Okay, I’ll explain. LRO is the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), which launched on the same rocket as LCROSS on June 18. BFF is Internet-speak for “best friends forever.” (But you knew that already, right?) And October 9 is D-day for the LCROSS mission.  Unlike LRO, which will accumulate its results slowly and steadily over a period of one to three years, LCROSS will go out in a blaze of glory, and will do all of its most interesting science over the course of 5 minutes.

LCROSS consists of two main pieces — a spent rocket booster and a “shepherding satellite.” On October 9, around 4:30 AM Pacific time, the bigger rocket booster will slam into a crater near the moon’s south pole. Imagine an SUV crashing head-on into the ground at more than 5000 miles per hour! That’s what the impact is going to be like. It will be equivalent to the explosion of about a ton of dynamite. 

The explosion will be big enough, in fact, to be seen from Earth. That is the whole idea — to time the impact so that it can be tracked by all of the big telescopes on Hawaii, as well as the Hubble Space Telescope. Colaprete says that even a 10-inch telescope (well within the range of many amateur astronomers) should be able to see the flash, if it is pointed in the right place at the right time. If you don’t have access to a 10-inch telescope, you can also watch the impact over the Internet.

A minute or so after the big kablooie, the shepherding satellite will come swooping in, flying right through the debris plume. While it’s getting buffeted about, it will hopefully be able to sniff out any volatile compounds that have been excavated by the blast, including water vapor — the number one target of the mission.

We’ve seen tantalizing hints of water ice from orbit, but nothing that absolutely confirms it. We know that there is hydrogen in the permanently shadowed craters near the south pole, but there is no guarantee that the hydrogen is bound up with oxygen to make a water molecule. There’s only one way to find out for sure, and that is to “reach out and touch it,”  as Colaprete says. Or perhaps “reach out and blow it up” would be a slightly more accurate wording.

After it flies through the plume, the shepherding satellite will itself crash into the moon a few minutes later, creating a second and smaller blast. Colaprete is deliberately not building up any great expectations for this one, because it will be harder to control where the shepherding satellite lands. However, it will give scientists a second chance to look for signs of water, or at least to understand the mechanical properties of the ground that LCROSS is crashing into.

Last month I had a chance to interview Colaprete by e-mail and then in person at the Moon Fest. I also went to his talk at the Lunar Science Forum. In my next post I will try to reproduce these three “conversations” as if they were all one interview.

By the way, the LCROSS mission reminds me of something interesting I learned when researching my moon book. After Russia launched Sputnik in 1957 and when our scientists and politicians were debating what we could do to respond, one of the crazy ideas that was floated was to nuke the moon. That’s right, launch a nuclear missile at the moon and blow it up, thereby proving somehow that we were bigger and badder than the Russkies.

What a stupendously bad idea this would have been, because we would have learned nothing from it. The response we chose instead — sending men to the moon — was vastly more difficult, but we got so much more out of it, including a real understanding of the moon’s origin and makeup, plus the fleeting goodwill of all of the rest of the world.

It’s just a tiny bit ironic, then, that on our second round of missions to the moon, one of the first things that we are doing is slamming a rocket as hard as we can into the moon to create a big explosion. I mention this parallel with some hesitation, because I don’t want to make LCROSS seem like just a stunt. That is exactly what it is NOT. There are two huge differences between this mission and the stunt that was proposed back in the late ’50s:

1. A spent rocket booster is not a nuke.
2. The LCROSS mission was designed with a specific scientific purpose in mind: to excavate water ice, to see first of all if there is any ice there and secondly how much there is and how easy it is to get it out. These are vital things to know if we are ever going to set up a permanent moon base.

Maybe these points are obvious and didn’t even need saying, but I just wanted to explain why the LCROSS mission is not just about some engineers blowing things up for fun.

(Still, blowing things up is fun … See any episode of Mythbusters for proof!)

Tags: blaze of glory, hydrogen, ice, kablooie, LCROSS, Mythbusters, nuke, Tony Colaprete, water
Posted in Science | 2 Comments »

A colder and wetter moon?

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

Yesterday I went to the Lunar Science Forum at Ames Research Center, which was the scientists’ version of a Moon Fest – a chance for all the recent and current moon missions to unveil their latest and greatest findings. According to the organizers, more than 500 people registered, including 200 just since last Friday. I don’t think that all these people actually came — the main meeting room holds 300, and it was not filled to capacity. Nevertheless, it was a well-attended (and well-Twittered) event.

Yesterday the science teams of the LRO and LCROSS missions, which just launched last month, presented their data publicly for the first time. As David Morrison, the head of the Lunar Science Institute, said in his introductory remarks, “Last year most of the papers reported plans, but I’m delighted to say that most of the talks this year are about results.”

All of the LRO results are very preliminary, because LRO is still in its “commissioning orbit,” when they are still warming up and checking out the systems. By the way, I mean warming up quite literally. Most of the instruments have residual moisture in them from their time on Earth. (So do most tourists, after a few hours in the humidity of south Florida!) So they have to go through a “bake-out” period to dry out all of that extra moisture. The LRO camera finished its bake-out on July 10, but even before then (as mentioned in this entry) it started sending back fabulous pictures.

Also, scientists from two other moon missions spoke yesterday. There was one presentation on the Japanese Kaguya mission that just ended a week before LRO lifted off, and three about the Indian Chandrayaan-1 mission that is still ongoing.

The most interesting news yesterday all had to do with results that we can’t really talk about yet! One of them is so preliminary that no one can really interpret it yet. The other two are results that are going to be published soon but are currently under “embargo,” meaning that the scientists aren’t supposed to talk about them until the publications come out.

First, David Paige, principal investigator for LRO’s Diviner experiment, showed some of Diviner’s first measures of the temperatures in the moon’s permanently shadowed craters. Remember that these are supposed to be “cold traps,” where water molecules could perhaps accumulate as ice because they are too cold to float away. The first temperature readings in Amundsen crater turned out to be even lower than expected: around 33 degrees Kelvin (or 33 degrees above absolute zero).

No one had predicted such a low temperature; I think that 70 degrees Kelvin was closer to what they had expected. As Paige said, “If this is true, it’s colder than the poles of Pluto!”

From his wording, you might correctly infer that Paige is not really sure this measurement is right. The instrument has been calibrated, but he said there are some possible reasons why the instrument-measured temperature may not be the same as the physical temperature. (For example, they don’t really know what kind of surface they are looking at — rocky or soft and fluffy — and that can make a difference to how they estimate the temperature.) The instrument is still too fresh and new, and the finding too unexpected, to put a lot of stock in it yet. But what it could mean is that the permanently shadowed craters are a better cold trap than we thought.

Two other surprising results that can’t be talked about yet came out of the Chandrayaan-1 mission. Carle Pieters of Brown University reported on the Moon Mineralogy Mapper, and said that her team had made a new discovery on lunar volatiles that she can’t discuss yet. Of course, the most important potential  ”lunar volatile” is water. But, she said, “Don’t give me wine and try to dig the secret out of me.”

Then Paul Spudis, whose Once and Future Moon blog is always thought-provoking, talked about the results from his mini-SAR (synthetic aperture radar) experiment, which is also on the Indian Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft. Like Pieters, he has a result that he can’t talk about yet, but he said, “I may be susceptible to being plied with drinks!”

Mini-SAR is also looking for water ice; the idea is that ice will reflect a circularly polarized radar beam differently from rocks. (The radar wave will actually go into the ice before bouncing back, because ice is transparent.) This is similar to the way that ice was first detected at the south pole, by the Clementine mission in 1994; Spudis was the deputy leader of the Clementine science team. However, the Clementine satellite only got one brief peek at the south pole, and so its results were very ambiguous. You can’t do very much in science with one data point. Chandrayaan-1 should do much better. We will have to wait to find out just how much better it’s done.

Nevertheless, I will transcribe a fascinating exchange that occurred during the audience-questions period after Spudis’ talk. Clive Neal, the chair of NASA’s Lunar Exploration Analysis Group (which advises NASA on the choice of moon missions) went to the microphone.

NEAL: You said there were some things that you cannot talk about, but then you proceeded to talk about some of them… (Laughter from audience.)

SPUDIS: You don’t know that! (Laughter.) You’re making an assumption, and maybe it’s warranted, maybe it isn’t.

NEAL: So I’ll ask my question as delicately as I can. You showed data that seemed to be consistent with the presence of water ice on the moon. Would you care to comment on that? (Loud laughter.)

SPUDIS. No! (Laughter.) But you’re welcome to draw whatever conclusions you care to.

NEAL: Can I just rephrase the question? If I buy you a beer, would you comment?

SPUDIS: It depends on what kind of beer and how much. (Laughter.)

DAVID MORRISON: I think all of us are beginning to assume that in a month or two we’ll have a wetter moon than we do now.

SPUDIS: Well, the moon isn’t going to change. (Laughter and applause.) Our perceptions might change. But, you know, some of us have had this perception for a long time.

Make of it what you will! Just don’t blame me for breaking any embargoes.

Other tidbits and factoids from the first day of the meeting:

These roads are so confusing.

• Google released its new version of Google Moon on Monday, and there was a large screen in the tent demonstrating it. It’s a huge improvement over the previous map-based Google Moon. This one has all the latest imagery from the LRO mission, and will continue to be updated constantly — so look for it to continue improving by leaps and bounds over the next year.
• The LRO launch was perfect, and that is very good news for the scientists, because it means that there is more fuel left for an extended mission than they could previously count on. Craig Tooley said that this could extend the life of the mission by a year. (The spacecraft has a planned one-year life span, followed by a two-year extended science mission. I interpret Tooley’s remarks to mean that it could continue orbiting for a fourth year.) I would think that the extra time would be especially valuable for the narrow-angle camera, which can only image about 10 percent of the moon in any given year.
• I asked Sam Lawrence, of the LRO camera team, whether they had felt under any pressure to get the pictures of the Apollo landing sites out early. He said, “I won’t lie to you. Several people in Headquarters simultaneously and independently came up with the idea of taking pictures of the Apollo landing sites. But Isaac Newton is in the driver’s seat. It was largely serendipity that we happened to be in the right place to image them.” In fact, the Apollo 12 landing site has not been imaged yet, but it should come around into the camera’s view in a couple of weeks.
• There was lots of Twittering going on at this conference. I sat behind someone whose laptop had a screen full of twitters. I have so far refused to get on twitter.com, but those of you who are might want to check out what the scientists are twittering about.
• Yes, there is such a thing as a free lunch! Registration for this conference was free (which is already unusual for a scientific meeting) and the Lunar Science Institute provided the lunch and refreshments free of charge, too! Shhh… Don’t tell Washington that they’re using your tax money to feed starving scientists …

Tags: Ames Research Center, beer, Chandrayaan, cold trap, free lunch, Google, ice, Kaguya, LCROSS, LRO, Lunar Science Forum, Lunar Science Institute, Twitter, water
Posted in Just for Fun, Missions, Science | 1 Comment »

LRO First Picture!

Saturday, July 4th, 2009

Two days ago, on July 2, NASA released the first photograph from the new Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. And here it is! (Actually, this is just a small piece of it, but a very interesting piece, as I will explain below.)

LRO First Light

The complete photograph is actually a very long strip, something like 500 by 50,000 pixels, taken near the edge of Mare Nubium in the moon’s southern hemisphere. The LRO website ways that the photo was taken near a crater called Hell … I’m not sure why. It doesn’t seem like the best place to start a mission!

If you want to find the location through a telescope or binoculars, it’s at about 30 degrees south latitude and 10 degrees west longitude. To the south is Tycho (one of the brightest craters on the moon), and to the north is an easily spotted trio of craters, Ptolemy, Alphonsus, and Arzachel. The best time for looking at this region was two days ago, when the picture was taken — and that is no accident. Photographers on Earth like to take pictures at sunset or sunrise, and so do lunar photographers! The lunar topography shows up most clearly near the “terminator” — the boundary between the day side and night side of the moon. The LRO spacecraft is currently in a terminator orbit, circling the moon from pole to pole and following the moon shadow around. This is the place to be if you want to take stunning photographs!

There are two very interesting things to notice in this picture. First, at the very bottom, you might notice a string of craters, like beads on a chain. Is this an accident? If not, how is a chain of craters like this formed? The answer is that they are “secondary craters” — craters formed by debris that is blasted off the moon’s surface by a meteorite impact. When the debris lands, it forms smaller craters all in a line. The first person to notice this phenomenon, I believe (perhaps some historians can correct me if I’m wrong) was Ralph Baldwin, an amateur astronomer in the 1940s. At the time, the conventional wisdom was that the moon’s craters were volcanoes. Baldwin put together many pieces of evidence, like this, to conclude that at least some of them were formed by impacts.  In this case, the amateur was right and the professionals were wrong.

Also, Baldwin noticed very large-scale linear patterns on the moon, which again seem to radiate outward from some of the great basin impacts. According to the LRO team, you can see some of the linear features in the photograph. I suspect that what they mean is the overall southwest-northeast orientation of the valleys in this photo. These furrows must have been scoured out by a vastly larger and earlier impact than the one that made the little chain of craters that I mentioned above.

As cool as the LRO pictures are, I want to mention that LRO is way, WAY more than just a camera. It has seven extremely cool instruments on it. I will list them below in no particular order of coolness. I will not translate the abbreviations into English — if you want to know what they stand for, check out the LRO website.

1. LAMP. How cool is this? We are going to see the dark regions of the moon by starlight. The stars give off ultraviolet light, and the whole darned galaxy glows at one particular wavelength, and we can use this invisible (to human eyes) light to peer into craters that never see the sun.
2. Diviner. We’re going to take the moon’s temperature. It’s not the same everywhere. Equatorial regions range from 150 degrees below zero (Celsius) to more than 100 degrees above zero (i.e., hotter than the boiling point of water).If you’re building a lunar base, that’s kind of tough to deal with. But near the poles, the temperature is much more even, although cold — roughly 100 to 120 degrees below zero.
3. CRaTER. This one is interesting because it is specifically directed towards human habitation. How much radiation does the moon get from the sun and from outer space? The answer will tell us how long we can keep astronauts on the moon’s surface safely. Remember that the Apollo astronauts were there for only three days or less.
4. LEND. Another instrument that will measure radiation — this time neutrons coming from inside the moon. This is kind of a repeat of the experiment that Lunar Prospector did to confirm the presence of hydrogen (and therefore maybe water) at the poles. An interesting point here is that it’s a Russian experiment flying on a NASA spacecraft — a nice example of international collaboration!
5. LOLA. This laser altimeter will construct 3-D images of the moon’s surface.
6. Mini-RF. A synthetic aperture radar that will search for ice at the lunar poles. This is similar to the Clementine experiment in 1994 that started all the excitement about water at the poles, but I assume it will be much better because it will have a lot more time to gather data and because it was designed for this purpose.
7. LROC, the LRO camera, which by now needs no introduction.

I am by no means an expert in all of these technologies (or any of them), but I hope that over the coming months I will have a chance to interview some of the scientists involved with these projects, so that I can tell you how they work.

One thing that I find interesting about the web links is that almost all of them mention that they are “heritage” or “legacy” instruments — in other words, similar experiments have flown on other NASA missions, to Mars or to other planets. In our budget-conscious age, NASA wants equipment that is cheap and reliable. Still, one can’t help feeling a little bit nostalgic for the 1960s and the Apollo missions, when nothing was a legacy experiment — everything was being done for the first time!

Tags: craters, equator, ice, LRO, NASA, opinions, poles, radiation, technology, telescope, water
Posted in Missions, Science | 5 Comments »